Buy Low Price From Here Now
GARMIN Forerunner 50 w/ HRM/Foot Pod/USB ANT Stick. Garmin International is pleased to announce the new Forerunner 50 sports watch with automatic sync. The Forerunner 50 is an affordable, streamlined sports watch that incorporates ANT plus Sport wireless technology. Its available with wireless heart rate or speed and distance /tracked by a foot pod, or with both. You can even use this versatile sports watch for cycling, when paired with an optional speed/cadence sensor, or for multi sport workouts. Once you have logged the miles, Garmins innovative ANT wireless technology automatically transfers workouts to your computer when your device is within range /approx. 30 ft. No cables, no hookups. The datas just there, ready for you to analyze, categorize and share through our new online community, Garmin Connect.
Readmore
Technical Details
- Forerunner 50 With Heart Rate Monitor & Foot Pod- Waterproof 30m
- Can Be Used Indoors Or Outdoors
- Multi-Sport Capabilities
- Transmits Workouts To A PC With The Included USB ANT Receiver
See more technical details
By M. Rippens (Los Angeles, CA)
I just began doing longer distance runs and wanted to know how far I was going (without circling a track all day). I opted for the Forerunner 50 as it was much more affordable, smaller and better looking than Garmin's other offerings. I ended up getting the hr monitor as well since it was only 10 bucks more than the watch and foot pod combo. The build quality of the components seemed excellent, but the foot pod's batteries were dead on arrival and the hr monitor's did not last much longer. I put in all new batteries and they worked fine. (Note: shaking the foot pod activates it and communicates with the watch. Since you can't turn off either device, keeping them in the same gym bag and moving them around can contribute to premature battery loss!) I did a few runs w/ the hr monitor. It worked well, but I found it too constricting. It was nice to get hr data, but I was more interested in distance, not improving my speed, so I've since stopped using it. The foot pod seemed a bit bulky at first, but once I'm running, I don't notice it at all. It seems to gauge my distance a little long, but its close enough that I haven't bothered to try and figure out how to calibrate it yet. The controls on the watch fall far short of intuitive and this can be rather annoying especially while running. Also, I'm never 100 percent sure I've pressed the button to start the workout or end it as well. If not done properly, this can cause you to lose all your workout data. Be sure to keep the manual handy for when you get stuck. I'm not a "manual person" so I'm probably not taking advantage of all the things this watch can do. But the biggest disappointment by far is the website. It took a bunch of downloads to get this thing to work on my mac, then half the time the watch doesn't communicate with the usb stick and I can't upload my data. The site itself looked very "blah" and the charts are totally useless, especially since it tracks all the "workouts" that you recorded by accident and keeps tracking your runs long after you've stopped (if you happen to forget to press the "end" button). After I deleted the bogus runs from my Garmin Connect site, they reappeared after the next upload because the watch stores previous runs and I always forget to delete them before each new workout. Annoying! I've taken to just keeping a manual log of the info from the watch on a word document. At least I know that program is going to open and I can see all my important data in a clear, organized manner without having to click and scroll through a series of windows. I was considering a Nike Plus Sportband before I bought the Garmin and still may get one to replace the Forerunner. I like the simplicity and ease of use of the Nike product and I don't want to keep a book in my gym bag just so I can use my watch correctly. Although the Garmin does seem to have more accurate data like calories burned, etc. since you enter personal info like weight, age and gender. I don't think the Nike gets this specific. The Nike website looks really cool, though, and the foot pod is microscopic compared to Garmin's. I guess the Garmin is more for a techie-athlete who wants tons of features and info at the expense of simplicity and ease of use.
By Jason Stokes (St. Louis)
I have this and the Forerunner 405 with GPS. To be honest, I bought this solely for the foot pod - purchasing this watch was only $10 more than buying the foot pod alone, which makes the Forerunner 50 a great deal. It also comes with an ANT+ stick ($40 from Garmin) and a heart rate monitor ($50 from Garmin). If you lose anything from one of the more expensive watches, it makes more sense to buy one of these. That said, to the review, and comparisons with the 405.
Pros of the Forerunner 50:
- No need to charge it! It runs on a normal watch battery, and appears to have a very long life.
- Pretty accurate once the foot pod is calibrated. Over a 6 mile run, it is within 2/10 of a mile. Not as accurate as the GPS watches, but still, if you want to measure yourself, this is a great way to do it.
- Slim design and easy to use. You can wear it with normal clothes and not look completely out of place, like with the MUCH larger GPS enabled models.
- Garmin connect software is pretty great. I can pop all my runs up, compare times, cadence, distance, and heart rate. For $100, this is a great feature.
Cons:
- No way to map out where you've run to track hills and such. Not that big of a deal.
- Have to calibrate it the first time - but seriously - 1 mile and it was calibrated. NOT a big deal.
In all, unless you're very serious about running and want to map everything out, this watch does 90% of what the more expensive GPS watches do at a fraction of the price. I love my 405, but won't slight this simpler model one bit.
By N. Saunders (France)
After only 4 months of use, my buttons (specifically the reset button) started to disintegrate (ie, half of it fell off) and the coating on the face of the watch peeled off. Garmin refused to replace or repair it, saying it was user error. I assure you that I just wore it like a normal watch. Poor manufacturing and poor customer service.
By B. Downs (Grayslake, IL USA)
This is the second Forerunner 50 I bought. I've owned one for about a year, and I just bought one for my wife as a birthday present. I think the Forerunner 50 is a great device if your looking for a basic distance/pace/heart rate monitor. The watch is about the size of a regular watch, the footpod is unnoticeable, and the heart rate monitor is very comfortable. I also like the computer software to organize all of my activities. I think this is great if you like running non-standard routes and you want to know how far your running! I highly recommend it to anyone who wants to run more seriously and track distance and time, and not break the bank.
By Girl Runner in GA (Georgia USA)
I bought this Forerunner 50 to track distance and have a visible (but not heavy) watchband display. First months of use were fine after I learned how to switch between modes. But after replacing the (watch) battery, the unit has been HUGELY UNRELIABLE. I use it twice a week, for long runs. The unit goes dead in between these uses and I have to completely reset the time, etc. It loses any saved history. After a couple of months of this behavior, now the thing STOPS TRACKING MY DISTANCE IN THE MIDDLE OF A RUN!! How frustrating! I run for miles, only to look down at the display and see that the distance monitor has stopped altogether! I am not sure what to buy that is similar product, without spending a fortune. I am not able to use GPS units because I run in tree covered trails sometimes.
Images Product
Buy Garmin 010-00679-25 Forerunner 50 with Heart Rate Monitor and Foot Pod Now
0 ความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น